tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13378665.post7451709740396701888..comments2024-03-01T16:32:41.076+08:00Comments on Sun Bin: "所有選民眼睛都是雪亮的"Sun Binhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08093210384069958083noreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13378665.post-15168459059863431262007-12-07T22:35:00.000+09:002007-12-07T22:35:00.000+09:00搞惦,寫完解讀曾鈺成《所有選民眼睛都是雪亮的》之一 和 二http://sickgambler.bl...搞惦,寫完解讀曾鈺成《所有選民眼睛都是雪亮的》之一 和 二<BR/><BR/>http://sickgambler.blogspot.com/2007/12/blog-post_9989.html<BR/><BR/>http://sickgambler.blogspot.com/2007/12/blog-post_9449.html賭徒https://www.blogger.com/profile/15361022296426600808noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13378665.post-55560573101519892232007-12-07T17:43:00.000+09:002007-12-07T17:43:00.000+09:00and Thank you for pointing tsang's blog. It's a t...and Thank you for pointing tsang's blog. It's a treasure to me.VChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08835426018233860968noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13378665.post-61954511095449186322007-12-07T17:37:00.000+09:002007-12-07T17:37:00.000+09:00Sun Bin, Ha Ha, hope you can use the money in a mo...Sun Bin, Ha Ha, hope you can use the money in a more profitable way la.<BR/><BR/>BTW, have you noticed the BARCLAYS.Global Commodoties Delta Fund?VChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08835426018233860968noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13378665.post-43947951511235082452007-12-07T15:39:00.000+09:002007-12-07T15:39:00.000+09:00其实你可以看得出我是捨不得卖282的。当天开市2.85(之前更低)。我把叫价定为2.93。潜意识里希...其实你可以看得出我是捨不得卖282的。<BR/>当天开市2.85(之前更低)。我把叫价定为2.93。潜意识里希望卖不出去。<BR/><BR/>所以这也是“天意”。让我言行一致。Sun Binhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08093210384069958083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13378665.post-19747615877538179462007-12-07T12:30:00.000+09:002007-12-07T12:30:00.000+09:00首先恭喜先生你能成功賣出282, 看來你的運氣很不差喎!從這次補選看來,無論從商業角度來說又好,從人...首先恭喜先生你能成功賣出282, 看來你的運氣很不差喎!<BR/>從這次補選看來,無論從商業角度來說又好,從人道立場來說又好,我個人認為生果報都應盡早結業. <BR/>從商業角度,孫生已在上一編文章分析過,在下沒有甚麼想補充.<BR/>從人道立場來看,不難察覺那些在萍果寫稿的,多都似是已患有一種像是腦部虧損的病,在下間稱之為[腦虧], 患有這種[腦虧]病的人,病徵都是和患有[腎虧]相類似的,會不時告急要以寫文章或去廁所抒發一下,這可能是在長期受壓趕稿做成的,建議應盡快找腦科醫生檢查一下,病向淺中醫.這種病也好可能帶傅染性,因不久前馬丁先生也有同樣病徵,而馬丁先生又像是同肥佬黎諗熟...<BR/>所以也應盡快通知世界衛生組織,好等他們能盡快安排專家來香港investigate一下,做好防疫措施,吸取了上次SARS的經驗,我相信世衛總幹事陳太今次一定可做得比上次更好.<BR/><BR/>Ps: 賭徒你還是節省一點把啦! Most of your info are from same source. 究竟是你頑固還是孫生呢? 看來你也中了蘋果毒.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13378665.post-37699747129893903382007-12-07T12:08:00.000+09:002007-12-07T12:08:00.000+09:00親中派有鐵票,泛民也有鐵票。親中派有鐵票,泛民也有鐵票。Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13378665.post-60607665040366682942007-12-07T10:10:00.000+09:002007-12-07T10:10:00.000+09:00今晚才有時間答,CU LATER今晚才有時間答,CU LATER賭徒https://www.blogger.com/profile/15361022296426600808noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13378665.post-79085168335772725432007-12-07T09:42:00.000+09:002007-12-07T09:42:00.000+09:00:) so the gap between us is not that wide, we agre...:) so the gap between us is not that wide, we agree on 1-4, at least.<BR/><BR/>my undertanding is that tsang's post is about 1-4. what is your objection regarding what he has written?Sun Binhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08093210384069958083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13378665.post-44225303240012282162007-12-07T09:29:00.000+09:002007-12-07T09:29:00.000+09:001. yes2. no3. no4. yes5. yes6. yes你要我答 yes no ques...1. yes<BR/>2. no<BR/>3. no<BR/>4. yes<BR/>5. yes<BR/>6. yes<BR/><BR/>你要我答 yes no question,我咪答囉。<BR/><BR/>蘋果最後的號外無疑是 over 左,但不是什麼死罪。他們在選舉前一日計過有輸的可能,才會一早安排出號外,當日投票率夠高時,其實要叫停。賭徒https://www.blogger.com/profile/15361022296426600808noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13378665.post-51512356168120569092007-12-07T09:16:00.000+09:002007-12-07T09:16:00.000+09:00i am frustrated, you never really answer any of my...i am frustrated, you never really answer any of my question explicitly, and never ask an explicit to me either.<BR/><BR/>there are a few separate issues, all got mixed up in your argument.<BR/>1) are all voters equal?<BR/>2) are all voter "iron"<BR/>3) are all voters for Ip "iron"<BR/>4) are stupid voters allowed to vote?<BR/>5) would the result be significantly different has there not been the AD propaganda<BR/>6) is the propaganda justifiable as a tactic.<BR/><BR/>you have so far focused in #6.<BR/><BR/>mr tsang did not even questioned about the AD tactic in his post. you are not answering his question.Sun Binhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08093210384069958083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13378665.post-43773481097304362832007-12-07T09:06:00.000+09:002007-12-07T09:06:00.000+09:00泛民由頭到尾都無強逼選民跟隨他們的意思投票,亦有說選民眼睛都是雪亮的。因為親中有鐵票存在,泛民才會告...泛民由頭到尾都無強逼選民跟隨他們的意思投票,亦有說選民眼睛都是雪亮的。<BR/><BR/>因為親中有鐵票存在,泛民才會告急。告急只是勸支持泛民的選民,當日請積極投票。他們無法用告急變改不支持他們的選民的想法。<BR/><BR/>我真係識不少當日有節目或有事在身的港島居民,也刻意返回自己選區投他神聖的一票。如果無告急策略,這批人就未必肯中斷自己的節目或工作,調節出時間去投票的。賭徒https://www.blogger.com/profile/15361022296426600808noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13378665.post-27725289707653978322007-12-07T06:49:00.000+09:002007-12-07T06:49:00.000+09:00http://thosewerethedays.wordpress.com/2007/12/04/%...http://thosewerethedays.wordpress.com/2007/12/04/%e7%ab%8b%e6%b3%95%e6%9c%83%e8%a3%9c%e9%81%b8%e7%9a%84%e6%aa%a2%e8%a8%8e/<BR/><BR/>上述文章有一个主要假设,就是这几年来双方的相对百分比不变。不过这假设有问题。<BR/>让我举个例子:本人和不少朋友,以前曾投过票给李柱铭,现在都不投了。这足以解释为什么票数比例不是一个常数。Sun Binhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08093210384069958083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13378665.post-1866910207356731362007-12-07T06:30:00.000+09:002007-12-07T06:30:00.000+09:00恕我唠叨,再说一句。即使是文盲,是维园阿伯,也有天赋人权和投票权,跟你我一样。这就是民主。不要贬低任...恕我唠叨,再说一句。<BR/><BR/>即使是文盲,是维园阿伯,也有天赋人权和投票权,跟你我一样。这就是民主。不要贬低任何人的投票权,不要贬低任何人的智慧和选择权。<BR/>这就是我要借曾文结论想表达的。<BR/><BR/>假如不懂这一点,就不要自封为“民主派”。这是我不相信99%泛民都如你们想法的原因。Sun Binhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08093210384069958083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13378665.post-15226350132271249082007-12-07T06:20:00.000+09:002007-12-07T06:20:00.000+09:00只想问你是否同意1) 所有選民眼睛都是雪亮的,或 所有選民都有同等权利,都值得同等尊重2)选民愚钝论...只想问你是否同意<BR/><BR/>1) 所有選民眼睛都是雪亮的,<BR/>或 所有選民都有同等权利,都值得同等尊重<BR/><BR/>2)选民愚钝论是否独裁者要否定普选的普遍借口?<BR/>-- 为什么民智未开论是出于所谓民主派之口?而不是“土共”之口?你们在玩角色互换?Sun Binhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08093210384069958083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13378665.post-13275625869147566722007-12-07T06:12:00.000+09:002007-12-07T06:12:00.000+09:00再為了鐵票之說寫了篇文章http://sickgambler.blogspot.com/2007/1...再為了鐵票之說寫了篇文章<BR/>http://sickgambler.blogspot.com/2007/12/blog-post_07.html<BR/><BR/> 鐵票之說<BR/><BR/>孫檳在自己的網誌"所有選民眼睛都是雪亮的"引用曾鈺成的《所有選民眼睛都是雪亮》文章再次否定鐵票之說。<BR/><BR/>原本不想再為此議題再和孫檳爭論,但看見他這麼頑固,實在忍不住氣。筆者無打算能用三言兩語說服孫檳,他仍然可以忽視小弟的留言,繼續尋找和他意見相同的文章支持自己。<BR/><BR/>筆者只是想指出他在文中一點錯誤之說,鐵票之說不是部分泛民份子的想法,是九成九泛民的想法。可能筆者見識少,到現今所看見有名有姓泛民人士,並沒有一個否定鐵票的根據。<BR/><BR/>不理客觀現實,盲目為自己想法護航,到最終是否自己呃自己呢?<BR/><BR/>當一名聰明人看到意見相左的論點時,是先假定對方意見是正確,再想辦法尋找對方意見不合理之處,來駁到對方的論點。並不是以主觀感覺行事!<BR/><BR/>孫檳,和筆者一同做一個測試吧,你先假定這篇網誌《立法會補選的檢討》是正確,再尋找他的謬誤,反駁這篇文章吧。筆者就用同一方法反駁曾鈺成的《所有選民眼睛都是雪亮》文章。孫檳,你肯試試嗎?賭徒https://www.blogger.com/profile/15361022296426600808noreply@blogger.com