I keep the same old WRONG title, because,
1) Blogger will change the permalink/etc if I change the title. This is a punishment for my careless mistake, a major mistake for someone who claim to be a map lover, so everyone knows that i made such a silly mistake.
2) I am no less guilty than CSB and Taiwan media, as Lin Cho-Shui correctly pointed out (do a search on 過境 on yahoo news Taiwan, less than 10% mention the name of destinaion country. most just said "2 conutries in C&S America". I know that should not be my excuse), in neglecting CSB's designated mission in this trip.
(As David noted in the comment below, ASU is 78 miles from the anti-pole of TPE, which makes the additional mileage in detours less dramatic than that of MVD. You can replace ASU with MVD in the "paths box" of the great circle links, you will see the difference in mileages are much bigger.)
---
(Warning: this is really a map/geography post, not a political post. The author takes Ah Bian "Astray Diplomacy 迷航外交" as an excuse to blog on geography.)
The shortest route from Taipei to
Therefore, a fueling station is needed. CSB wanted to refuel at NYC, SFO or LAX. But these paths do not make much sense, said DPP legislator Lin Cho-Shui. Lin contends that the purpose of the trip is to visit Montevideo, not big cities in USA.
- 林濁水表示,就算是高層出訪過境美國一百次,每次美方都多提供一點點接待規格,臺灣與美國的關係也沒有正常化...他痛批,政府的心態是把過境當成外交的主軸,爭取到一點表面的規格就洋洋得意,完全是荒唐,不要把國家資源浪費在沒意義的過境爭取上。
- "the government has made transit the core axis of diplomacy, and flatters itself when it receives every insignificant gesture [from USA]. This is totally ridiculous. Do not waste resources on meaningless transit diplomacy....even if Taiwan received elevated treatment every time for 100 times, there is no impact on the normalization of Taiwan-US relationship."
- TPE-JNB-ASU: 12368 (miles)
- TPE-JFK-ASU: 12459
- TPE-ANC-ASU: 12485
- TPE-SFO-ASU: 12502
- TPE-LAX-ASU: 12503
P.S. US also suggested the best path for Taipei-San Jose(Costa Rica), CSB obliged. CSB also chose ANC over HNL as transit point to ASU, due to better path and logistics.
- TPE-SJO (great circle): 9478
- TPE-ANC-SJO: 9496
- TPE-SFO-SJO: 9508
- TPE-HNL-SJO: 10001
- TPE-JFK-SJO: 10012
Update:
Latest rumour: CSB is making a 'protest transit' at Tripoli or Beirut.
TPE-BEY-ASU=12381; TPE-BEY-ASU=12385
Better choices than ANC.
New update (May 4):
Ooops it is Abu Dhabi! Lebanon rejected the request.
A small problem: TPE-AUH-ASU=4139+8234=12373 miles, although an overall shorter distance, it is not a mid-point refuel. i.e. the second segment AUH-ASU is 8234 miles, 747 can handle this with no problem, but for safety, it might need a "forced" re-fuel if encounters headwind. Let's pray for the wind.
New update (May 5):
According to the "Foreign Minister" Huang, the Aquafresh plane will have to refuel at Dominican Republic again. Pretty big detour this time.
New mileage: TPE-AUH-SDQ-ASU=4139+7671+3111=14911, what a mileage run! Is CSB trying to earn more miles for his children? Given the recent controversial of family member tag-along to AUH.
(update):
Of course, there is a latest twist. Because the ground temperature in AUH is too high, 47 degrees Celsius. The plane could not refuel fully (avoid high pressure in gas tank). The plane could not even reach Santo Domingo, it stopped at Amsterdam. TPE-AUH-AMS-ASU=13891.
Refueling stop for the return trip is another game to play. "Guerilla diplomacy", some say. Perhaps not Anchorage.
8 comments:
Somehow I don't think saving on fuel and flighttime is the main thing on CSBs mind - but you knew that :)
Interesting that Paraguay is exactly on the other side of the world to Taiwan - so you could take any route you wanted to get there ...
Thanks, ESWN. That was a terrible mistake by me. As this is "intended" to be a goegraphy post. :) I do think I saw Uraguay in one of the news report. But still, no excuse. A few hundred miles away, but some difference in the numbers and conclusion. The shortest path from TPE to MVD is via Perth, while that for TPE-ASU is via Jo'berg.
David, of course you are right. So I thought your Karl Rove post is a lot more interesting. The point here is mainly to echo Lin Cho-Shui's, that the transit diplomacy is "舍本逐末". Seriously, what is the point of passing through USA every year? this just opens yourself up to more opportunities of being hijacked by US.
Huang Chi-fang seems to suggest that CSB's next trip will make it to NYC. I am afraid he is just paving way for another humiliation in future.
related report on transit locations
david,
i just check the coordinates of ASU and TPE. the anti-pole of TPE is 25/04/40S;58/46/02W, it is 78.8 miles from ASU 25/14/23S;57/31/09W.
these are coordinates of the airports, not the downtowns.
Because of this, the difference of taking different paths is very small. the results are much less dramatic than that of TPE-MVD (which is over 1000 mile difference for different transit points)
There's another blog talks about the flight distance.
http://www.becreative.to/carpier/carpier/0605.html
thanks siegfried. interesting discussions.
seems his graph also taken from the great circle site.
however, he is wrong in that there is no transit required. the range of 747-400 is a bit over 8000 miles, although an empty aircraft could fly from LHR to SYD. see wiki entry on Boeing 747-400
stratfor believes US snubs both sides of the straits on purpose.
What's matter, know-it-all Sun Bin wannabe? Where is your mad dizzy overly genius intellect? You should be able to set up your ambush with that written paper of "You die on here" for CSB before fire your gay outdated arrows of death. Lol!!
Iron_Jackal_TW
Post a Comment